Appendix E
GOLDWATER-NICHOLS ACT IMPLEMENTATION REPORT
This appendix contains the Department's Joint Officer Management Annual Report for FY 1996. Except for the progress/compliance with Section 619a, Title 10, United States Code, Tables E-2, E-5, reasons in Tables E-9 and E-11, and promotion objectives, the Joint Duty Assignment Management Information System (JDAMIS) was used to produce this report.
PROGRESS/COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 619a, TITLE 10, U.S. CODE
Section 931 of the FY 1994 National Defense Authorization Act required each Service to develop and implement personnel plans to permit the orderly promotion of officers to brigadier general or rear admiral (lower half). As addressed by the certification report submitted to Congress in June 1995, these plans have been developed and fully implemented by the Department. The Services have continued to revise career development paths to accommodate early joint assignments; assign greater numbers of former 0-5/0-6 commanders and Senior Service College graduates to joint duty; educate the officer corps on joint education opportunities; and toughen the quality standards for Joint Specialty Officer (JSO) designation.
The following brigadier general/rear admiral (lower half) promotion boards
were completed during FY 1996 (does not include professionals):
|
The Department is committed to ensuring the completion of a joint duty assignment
remains an essential element of an officer's ability to perform duties at
the general/flag officer level. Attention will continue to be devoted to
guarantee long-term compliance with the personnel policy objectives of the
Goldwater-Nichols DoD Reorganization Act of 1986.
| SUMMARY OF JSOs WITH CRITICAL OCCUPATIONAL SPECIALTIES WHO ARE SERVING OR HAVE SERVED IN A SECOND JOINT ASSIGNMENT (AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996) | Table E-4 | ||||
| USA | USAF | USMC | USN | TOTAL | |
| Field Grade | |||||
| Have served* Are serving* |
163 (46) 155 (74) |
173 (66) 141 (68) |
21 (9) 17 (9) |
41 (16) 51 (29) |
398 (137) 364 (180) |
| General/Flag | |||||
| Have served* Are serving* |
14 (7) 12 (9) |
18 (7) 29 (10) |
5 (3) 4 (3) |
11 (6) 7 (3) |
48 (23) 52 (25) |
| * Number in parenthesis indicates number of second joint assignments which were to a critical joint position. | |||||
| ANALYSIS OF THE ASSIGNMENT WHERE OFFICERS
WERE REASSIGNED (IN FY 1996) ON THEIR FIRST ASSIGNMENT FOLLOWING DESIGNATION AS A JOINT SPECIALTY OFFICER |
Table E-5 | ||||
| ASSIGNMENT CATEGORY | USA | USAF | USMC | USN | TOTAL |
| Command | 116 | 39 | 10 | 13 | 178 |
| Service HQ | 13 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 31 |
| Joint Staff critical | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
| Joint Staff other | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| Other JDA critical | 15 | 6 | 1 | 9 | 31 |
| Other JDA | 84 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 99 |
| PME | 15 | 22 | 2 | 2 | 41 |
| Other Operations | 32 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 52 |
| Other Staff | 60 | 12 | 4 | 13 | 89 |
| Other Shore | -- | -- | -- | 6 | 6 |
| * For the Marine Corps: Other Operations = Fleet Marine Force; Other Staff = Non-Fleet Marine Corps | |||||
| AVERAGE LENGTH OF TOURS OF DUTY IN JOINT
DUTY ASSIGNMENTS (FY 1996) (IN MONTHS) |
Table E-6 | ||
| GENERAL/FLAG OFFICERS | |||
| JOINT STAFF | OTHER JOINT | JOINT TOTAL | |
| USA | 20.8 | 25.5 | 24.4 |
| USAF | 22.8 | 24.4 | 24.0 |
| USMC | 15.0 | 24.0 | 22.7 |
| USN | 26.6 | 25.3 | 25.6 |
| DoD | 22.8 | 25.1 | 24.6 |
| FIELD GRADE OFFICERS | |||
| JOINT STAFF | OTHER JOINT | JOINT TOTAL | |
| USA | 32.9 | 37.0 | 36.5 |
| USAF | 35.5 | 38.2 | 37.9 |
| USMC | 35.8 | 39.6 | 39.3 |
| USN | 36.6 | 38.6 | 38.4 |
| DoD | 34.8 | 38.0 | 37.6 |
| SUMMARY OF TOUR LENGTH EXCLUSIONS FOR FY 1996 | Table E-7 | ||||
| CATEGORY | USA | USAF | USMC | USN | TOTAL |
| Retirement | 141 | 140 | 7 | 40 | 328 |
| Separation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |
| Suspension from duty | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
| Compassionate/Medical | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| Other joint after promotion | 15 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 17 |
| Reorganization | 11 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 14 |
| Joint overseas-short tours | 183 | 132 | 12 | 39 | 366 |
| Joint accumulation | 6 | 18 | 0 | 2 | 26 |
| COS reassignment | 145 | 124 | 10 | 129 | 408 |
| TOTAL | 516 | 424 | 31 | 226 | 1197 |
| JOINT DUTY POSITION DISTRIBUTION BY
SERVICE (AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996) |
Table E-8 | ||||
| JOINT STAFF | OTHER JOINT DUTY |
TOTAL JOINT DUTY |
TOTAL DOD JDAs% |
TOTAL DOD OFFICERS %* |
|
| USA | 269 | 2980 | 3249 | 34.8% | 28.7% |
| USAF | 270 | 3247 | 3517 | 37.7% | 38.1% |
| USMC | 65 | 494 | 559 | 6.0% | 8.4% |
| USN | 213 | 1802 | 2015 | 21.6% | 24.8% |
| DoD | 817 | 8523 | 9340 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
* Total Commissioned Officers: 0-3 through 0-10 less professional categories.
| CRITICAL POSITIONS SUMMARY (AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996) | Table E-9 | ||||
| Category | USA | USAF | USMC | USN | TOTAL |
| Total Critical Positions | 366 | 351 | 59 | 195 | 971 |
| Number of Vacant Positions | 54 | 80 | 20 | 57 | 211 |
| Of Those Filled, Number (and %) Filled by JSOs | 281 (90%) | 239 (88%) | 31 (79%) | 121 (88%) | 672 (88%) |
| Number of Critical Positions Filled by Non-JSOs | 31 | 32 | 8 | 17 | 88 |
| Percent of Critical Positions Filled by JSOs or Non-JSOs | 85% | 77% | 66% | 71% | 78% |
Reasons for filling critical positions with officers who are not JSOs are listed below:
| Position filled by non-JSO incumbent prior to being a joint position | 0 |
| Position being converted to a noncritical position or being deleted | 6 |
| Joint specialist officer not yet available | 31 |
| Best qualified officer not joint specialist | 50 |
| Position filled by non-JSO incumbent prior to being a critical position | 1 |
| Other | 0 |
| TOTAL | 88 |
The following organizations have joint duty critical positions which are filled by officers who do not possess the joint specialty:
| COMPARISON OF WAIVER USAGE (FY 1996) | Table E-10 | ||||
| CATEGORY | USA | USAF | USMC | USN | TOTAL |
| Field Grade Section | |||||
| JSO Designations | 345 | 125 | 0 | 43 | 513 |
| JSO Sequence Waivers | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| JSO Two-tour Waivers | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| JSOs Graduating from JPME | 5 | 14 | 1 | 9 | 29 |
| JDA Assignment Waivers Granted | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Field Grade Officers who departed JDAs | 1070 | 1081 | 151 | 471 | 2773 |
| Field Grade JDA tour length waivers | 80 | 78 | 0 | 19 | 177 |
| General/Flag Officer Section | |||||
| General/Flag Officers who departed JDAs | 45 | 33 | 9 | 33 | 120 |
| Attended CAPSTONE | 36 | 41 | 12 | 24 | 113 |
| General/Flag Officer JDA tour length waivers | 10 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 23 |
| CAPSTONE Waivers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| * Selected for Promotion to 0-7 | 45 | 51 | 8 | 34 | 138 |
| Good of the Service Waivers | 13 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 21 |
| Other Waivers | 18 | 19 | 2 | 22 | 61 |
* Does not include professional categories.
| JOINT PROFESSIONAL MILITARY EDUCATION
(PME) PHASE II SUMMARY (FY 1996) |
Table E-11 | ||||
| USA | USAF | USMC | USN | TOTAL | |
| Students graduating from Armed Forces Staff College in FY 1996 |
282 | 321 | 46 | 212 | 861 |
| Students who had not completed resident PME (percent of total) |
43(15%) | 68(21%) | 0(0%) | 73(35%) | 184(21%) |
| Students who had completed nonresident PME (percent of total) |
40(14%) | 68(21%) | 0(0%) | 72(34%) | 180(21%) |
| Students who had not completed resident or nonresident
PME (percent of total) |
3(1%) | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 1(0%) | 4(0%) |
Reasons for students not completing resident Professional Military Education
(PME) prior to attending Phase II
| Officer completed Phase I by correspondence/seminar | 173 | |
| Officer completed Phase I equivalent program | 7 | |
| Officer scheduled to attend a resident PME immediately following Phase II | 1 | |
| Officer career path did not allow attendance at a resident PME program | 3 | |
| Other | 0 |
Joint Officer Promotion Rates
Table E-12 (Air Force)
Table E-12 (Army)
Table E-12 (Marine Corps)
Table E-12 (Navy)