Exec Home PageTable of ContentsBottom of PageNext Page


Appendix E
GOLDWATER-NICHOLS ACT IMPLEMENTATION REPORT

This appendix contains the Department's Joint Officer Management Annual Report for FY 1996. Except for the progress/compliance with Section 619a, Title 10, United States Code, Tables E-2, E-5, reasons in Tables E-9 and E-11, and promotion objectives, the Joint Duty Assignment Management Information System (JDAMIS) was used to produce this report.

PROGRESS/COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 619a, TITLE 10, U.S. CODE

Section 931 of the FY 1994 National Defense Authorization Act required each Service to develop and implement personnel plans to permit the orderly promotion of officers to brigadier general or rear admiral (lower half). As addressed by the certification report submitted to Congress in June 1995, these plans have been developed and fully implemented by the Department. The Services have continued to revise career development paths to accommodate early joint assignments; assign greater numbers of former 0-5/0-6 commanders and Senior Service College graduates to joint duty; educate the officer corps on joint education opportunities; and toughen the quality standards for Joint Specialty Officer (JSO) designation.

The following brigadier general/rear admiral (lower half) promotion boards were completed during FY 1996 (does not include professionals):

CATEGORY USA USAF USMC USN
Number of officers selected for O-7 45 51 8 34
Number (percent) of officers joint qualified 18 (40%) 39 (76%) 5 (63%) 11 (32%)
Number of joint equivalency waivers used (percent) 4 (9%) 1 (2%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)


The Department is committed to ensuring the completion of a joint duty assignment remains an essential element of an officer's ability to perform duties at the general/flag officer level. Attention will continue to be devoted to guarantee long-term compliance with the personnel policy objectives of the Goldwater-Nichols DoD Reorganization Act of 1986.

SUMMARY OF JOINT SPECIALTY OFFICER AND JOINT
SPECIALTY OFFICER NOMINEE DESIGNATIONS FOR FY 1996
Table E-1
CATEGORY USA USAF USMC USN TOTAL
Number of officers
designated asJSOs
346 125 0 44 515
Number of officers
designated as JSO nominees
797 934 140 485 2356
Number of JSO nominees
designated under COS provisions
405 471 97 292 1265

CRITICAL OCCUPATIONAL SPECIALTIES (COS) Table E-2
USA USAF USMC USN
Infantry Pilot Infantry Surface
Armor Navigator Tanks/AAV Submariner
Artillery Command/Control Operations Artillery Aviation
Air Defense Artillery Space/Missile Operations Air Control/Air Support/
Antiair Warfare
SEALS
Aviation Aviation Special Operations
Special Operations
Combat Engineers


SUMMARY OF OFFICERS ON ACTIVE DUTY WITH A CRITICAL
OCCUPATIONAL SPECIALTY (AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996)
Table E-3
CATEGORY USA USAF USMC USN TOTAL
COS officers who have completed JPME 1566 1952 509 1264 5291
COS officers designated as JSOs 1109 1037 430 899 3475
COS officers designated as JSO nominees 2144 2863 554 1717 7278
COS officers designated as JSO nominees who
have not completed JPME
1495 1810 353 1330 4988
COS JSO nominees currently serving in aJDA 1149 1212 253 832 3446
COS JSO nominees who completed a JDA and
are currently attending JPME
8 0 1 0 9


SUMMARY OF JSOs WITH CRITICAL OCCUPATIONAL SPECIALTIES WHO ARE SERVING OR HAVE SERVED IN A SECOND JOINT ASSIGNMENT (AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996) Table E-4
USA USAF USMC USN TOTAL
Field Grade
Have served*
Are serving*
163 (46)
155 (74)
173 (66)
141 (68)
21 (9)
17 (9)
41 (16)
51 (29)
398 (137)
364 (180)
General/Flag
Have served*
Are serving*
14 (7)
12 (9)
18 (7)
29 (10)
5 (3)
4 (3)
11 (6)
7 (3)
48 (23)
52 (25)
* Number in parenthesis indicates number of second joint assignments which were to a critical joint position.

ANALYSIS OF THE ASSIGNMENT WHERE OFFICERS WERE
REASSIGNED (IN FY 1996) ON THEIR FIRST ASSIGNMENT
FOLLOWING DESIGNATION AS A JOINT SPECIALTY OFFICER
Table E-5
ASSIGNMENT CATEGORY USA USAF USMC USN TOTAL
Command 116 39 10 13 178
Service HQ 13 6 6 6 31
Joint Staff critical 2 2 0 4 8
Joint Staff other 6 6 0 0 12
Other JDA critical 15 6 1 9 31
Other JDA 84 10 2 3 99
PME 15 22 2 2 41
Other Operations 32 5 5 10 52
Other Staff 60 12 4 13 89
Other Shore -- -- -- 6 6
* For the Marine Corps: Other Operations = Fleet Marine Force; Other Staff = Non-Fleet Marine Corps

AVERAGE LENGTH OF TOURS OF DUTY IN JOINT DUTY
ASSIGNMENTS (FY 1996) (IN MONTHS)
Table E-6
GENERAL/FLAG OFFICERS

    
JOINT STAFF OTHER JOINT JOINT TOTAL
USA 20.8 25.5 24.4
USAF 22.8 24.4 24.0
USMC 15.0 24.0 22.7
USN 26.6 25.3 25.6
DoD 22.8 25.1 24.6
FIELD GRADE OFFICERS

    
JOINT STAFF OTHER JOINT JOINT TOTAL
USA 32.9 37.0 36.5
USAF 35.5 38.2 37.9
USMC 35.8 39.6 39.3
USN 36.6 38.6 38.4
DoD 34.8 38.0 37.6

SUMMARY OF TOUR LENGTH EXCLUSIONS FOR FY 1996 Table E-7
CATEGORY USA USAF USMC USN TOTAL
Retirement 141 140 7 40 328
Separation 0 0 0 15 15
Suspension from duty 9 4 0 0 13
Compassionate/Medical 6 3 1 0 10
Other joint after promotion 15 1 1 0 17
Reorganization 11 2 0 1 14
Joint overseas-short tours 183 132 12 39 366
Joint accumulation 6 18 0 2 26
COS reassignment 145 124 10 129 408
TOTAL 516 424 31 226 1197

JOINT DUTY POSITION DISTRIBUTION BY SERVICE
(AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996)
Table E-8

    
JOINT STAFF OTHER
JOINT DUTY
TOTAL
JOINT DUTY
TOTAL
DOD JDAs%
TOTAL DOD
OFFICERS %*
USA 269 2980 3249 34.8% 28.7%
USAF 270 3247 3517 37.7% 38.1%
USMC 65 494 559 6.0% 8.4%
USN 213 1802 2015 21.6% 24.8%
DoD 817 8523 9340 100.0% 100.0%

* Total Commissioned Officers: 0-3 through 0-10 less professional categories.

CRITICAL POSITIONS SUMMARY (AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996) Table E-9
Category USA USAF USMC USN TOTAL
Total Critical Positions 366 351 59 195 971
Number of Vacant Positions 54 80 20 57 211
Of Those Filled, Number (and %) Filled by JSOs 281 (90%) 239 (88%) 31 (79%) 121 (88%) 672 (88%)
Number of Critical Positions Filled by Non-JSOs 31 32 8 17 88
Percent of Critical Positions Filled by JSOs or Non-JSOs 85% 77% 66% 71% 78%

Reasons for filling critical positions with officers who are not JSOs are listed below:

Position filled by non-JSO incumbent prior to being a joint position 0
Position being converted to a noncritical position or being deleted 6
Joint specialist officer not yet available 31
Best qualified officer not joint specialist 50
Position filled by non-JSO incumbent prior to being a critical position 1
Other 0
TOTAL 88

The following organizations have joint duty critical positions which are filled by officers who do not possess the joint specialty:

Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) 3
Joint Staff 18
U.S. Atlantic Command (USACOM) 4
U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM 2
U.S. European Command (USEUCOM) 2
U.S. Pacific Command (USPACOM) 5
U.S. Southern Command (USSOUTHCOM) 2
U.S. Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) 3
U.S. Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) 1
Allied Command Europe (ACE) 12
Defense Attaches 5
Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) 3
Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) 2
Deputy Chairman NATO Military Committee 1
Joint Warfighting Center 1
Joint Interagency Anti-drug Task Force 1
Defense Special Weapons Agency 1
National Defense University (NDU) 3
Non-Joint Staff (G/FO) 19
TOTAL 88

COMPARISON OF WAIVER USAGE (FY 1996) Table E-10
CATEGORY USA USAF USMC USN TOTAL
Field Grade Section

    

    

    

    

    
JSO Designations 345 125 0 43 513
JSO Sequence Waivers 5 2 0 0 7
JSO Two-tour Waivers 0 4 0 0 4
JSOs Graduating from JPME 5 14 1 9 29
JDA Assignment Waivers Granted 2 2 0 1 5
Field Grade Officers who departed JDAs 1070 1081 151 471 2773
Field Grade JDA tour length waivers 80 78 0 19 177
General/Flag Officer Section

    

    

    

    

    
General/Flag Officers who departed JDAs 45 33 9 33 120
Attended CAPSTONE 36 41 12 24 113
General/Flag Officer JDA tour length waivers 10 7 0 6 23
CAPSTONE Waivers 0 0 0 0 0
* Selected for Promotion to 0-7 45 51 8 34 138
Good of the Service Waivers 13 0 1 7 21
Other Waivers 18 19 2 22 61

* Does not include professional categories.

JOINT PROFESSIONAL MILITARY EDUCATION (PME) PHASE II
SUMMARY (FY 1996)
Table E-11

    
USA USAF USMC USN TOTAL
Students graduating from Armed
Forces Staff College in FY 1996
282 321 46 212 861
Students who had not completed
resident PME (percent of total)
43(15%) 68(21%) 0(0%) 73(35%) 184(21%)
Students who had completed
nonresident PME (percent of total)
40(14%) 68(21%) 0(0%) 72(34%) 180(21%)
Students who had not completed resident or nonresident PME
(percent of total)
3(1%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 1(0%) 4(0%)


Reasons for students not completing resident Professional Military Education (PME) prior to attending Phase II
Officer completed Phase I by correspondence/seminar 173
Officer completed Phase I equivalent program 7
Officer scheduled to attend a resident PME immediately following Phase II 1
Officer career path did not allow attendance at a resident PME program 3
Other 0

Attachments:

Joint Officer Promotion Rates
Table E-12 (Air Force)
Table E-12 (Army)
Table E-12 (Marine Corps)
Table E-12 (Navy)


ExecSec Home PageTable of ContentsTop of PageNext Page