This appendix contains the Department's Joint Officer Management Annual Report for FY 1994. Except for the progress/compliance with Section 619a, Title 10, United States Code, Tables E-2, E-5, reasons in Tables E-9 and E-11, and promotion objectives, the Joint Duty Assignment Management Information Syustem (JDAMIS) was used to produce this report.
PROGRESS/COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 619A, TITLE 10, U.S. CODE
Section 931 of the National Defense Authorization Act required each Military Service to develop and implement personnel plans to permit the orderly promotion of officers to brigadier general or rear admiral (lower half). As addressed by the certification report submitted to Congress in June 1994,these plans have been developed and fully implemented by the Department. Highlights of Service intiatives are as follows:
Additionally, one brigadier general promotion selection board (Army) was conducted during FY 1994 after implementation of the Service plans. The Army reduced its overall reliance on waivers by 17 percent from FY 1993 and over 67 percent of those selected were alredy joint qualified and available for in-Service requirements.
The Department is committed to ensuring the completion on a joint duty assignment remains an essential element of an officer's ability to perform duties at the general/flag officer level. Attention will continue to be devoted to guarantee long-term compliance with the personnel policy objectives of the Goldwater-Nichols Reorganization Act of 1986.
Joint Specialty Officer & Critical Occupational Specialties
Officers & JSOs With Critical Occupational Specialties
Analysis of Assignment & Average Length of Tours
Tour Length Exclusions & Joint Duty Position Distribution
| Reasons for filling critical positions with officers who are not JSOs are listed below: | |
|---|---|
| Position filled by incumbent prior to being a joint position: | 2 |
| Position being converted to a noncritical position or being deleted: | 5 |
| Joint specialist officer not yet available: | 16 |
| Best qualified officer not joint specialist: | 25 |
| Position filled by incumbent prior to being a critical position: | 16 |
| Officer reassigned internally by organization: | 5 |
| Other: | 28 |
| Total 94 | |
| THE FOLLOWING ORGANIZATIONS HAVE JOINT DUTY CRITICAL POSITIONS WHICH ARE FILED BY OFFICERS WHO DO NOT POSSESS THE JOINT SPECIALTY: | |
|---|---|
| US Atlantic Command (USACOM) | 9 |
| US Central Command (USCENTCOM) | 4 |
| Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) | 3 |
| US European Command (USEUCOM) | 2 |
| US Command/Combined Forces Command | 3 |
| US National Military Representative | 1 |
| National Defense University (NDU) | 1 |
| US Space Command (USSPACECOM) | 3 |
| Defense Nuclear Agency (DNA) | 2 |
| Defense Mapping Agency (DMA) | 0 |
| Defense Logistics Agency | 4 |
| Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) | 2 |
| Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) | 4 |
| Defense Attache' | 3 |
| Office Of Emergency Operations (OEO) | 3 |
| On-Site Inspection Agency (OSIA) | 1 |
| Joint Staff | 6 |
| US Military Entrance Processing Command (USMEPCOM) | 0 |
| US Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) | 3 |
| US Pacific Command (USPACOM) | 9 |
| US Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) | 5 |
| US Southern Command (USSOUTHCOM) | 2 |
| US Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) | 2 |
| US Delegation to the NATO Military Committee | 1 |
| Allied Command Europe (ACE) | 15 |
| Allied Command Atlantic (ACLANT) | 2 |
| Non-Joint Staff (G/FO) | 14 |
| TOTAL 94 | |
Waiver Usage & Joint Professional Military Education
Desert Shield/Desert Storm Joint Duty Credit
Fiscal Year 1994 Joint Officer Promotion Rates
Joint Officer Promotion Rates (Cont.)
Joint Officer Promotion Rates (Cont.)
Joint Officer Promotion Rates (Cont.)
Joint Officer Promotion Rates (Cont.)
Joint Officer Promotion Rates (Cont.)
Joint Officer Promotion Rates (Cont.)
